ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Systematic Review on Large Language Models in Orthopaedic Surgery.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models show distinct multidimensional performance profiles and variable reproducibility in consensus-based bone stress injury.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review of Clinical Efficacy, Technical Integration, and Ethical Paradigms.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- [Artificial intelligence in the preparation of clinical expert opinions : Current evidence, use cases, and limitations in orthopedic assessment].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Potential and Pitfalls of Multimodal Large Language Models in Cerebral Palsy Hip Surveillance: A Radiographic Interpretation Study Assessing Educational Utility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.