Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869672›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Resect and Retrieve Colorectal Polyps: Time for New Insights.

Giulia Gibiino, Cecilia Binda, Matteo Secco, Lorenzo Cosentino, Francesco Poggioli, Stefania Cappetta, Davide Trama, Andrea Fabbri, Chiara Coluccio, Carlo Fabbri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giulia GibiinoGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-6322
Cecilia BindaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-9684
Matteo SeccoS. C. of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-3706
Lorenzo CosentinoGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
Francesco PoggioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Stefania CappettaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Davide TramaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
Andrea FabbriGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
Chiara ColuccioGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.
Carlo FabbriGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, 47121 Forlì, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-9910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyp retrieval following colorectal polypectomy remains a critical step for histopathological analysis and determining appropriate surveillance intervals. Despite reported retrieval rates exceeding 90% in the literature, significant heterogeneity persists in clinical practice, particularly for polyps < 10 mm, due to the lack of standardized retrieval methods. This review synthesizes current evidence on polyp retrieval techniques, the impact of lesion size, and device-specific considerations, including suction-based methods, retrieval nets, and other approaches such as the water-bolus and water-slider techniques. We also examine the clinical utility and limitations of the "resect and discard" and "diagnose and leave in situ" strategies, highlighting barriers to widespread implementation such as medico-legal risks, variability in optical diagnosis, and discrepancies across international guidelines. The integration of advanced imaging technologies, including high-definition endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, and artificial intelligence-driven computer-aided diagnosis (CADx), represent promising tools to help in increasing the diagnostic accuracy of diminutive polyps. As post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations remain tethered to histological findings, this review underlines the need for updated, evidence-based frameworks that take into account technological advancements while ensuring diagnostic precision, cost-effectiveness, and patient safety in colorectal cancer prevention.

Indexed as

colorectal adenomaendoscopic resectionsurveillance colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40869672
PMCPMC12387966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.