Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869646›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Advancements in Inlay Glenoid Components for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review.

Akshay R Reddy, Keegan M Hones, Taylor R Rakauskas, Joseph J King, Thomas W Wright, Bradley S Schoch, Kevin A Hao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Akshay R ReddyCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-9890
Keegan M HonesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9444-9145
Taylor R RakauskasCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0221-9483
Joseph J KingDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-9408
Thomas W WrightDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
Bradley S SchochDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Kevin A HaoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0682-8381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is a successful procedure that provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function in most patients, its success has been limited by glenoid component loosening. While series reporting the outcomes of inlay glenoid components have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes with low rates of component loosening and need for revision, surgeons have been hesitant to adopt these implants due to concerns of inadequate pain relief secondary to the remaining glenoid rim contacting the humeral head implant. The inset glenoid component, a variant of the traditional inlay components, has gained interest because its design aims to achieve similar stability to traditional inlay components through implantation within strong subchondral bone, reduce the amount of glenoid vault removed compared to inlay components, and has a glenoid face designed to limit the rocking-horse phenomenon. In limited series, the inset glenoid component has demonstrated superior biomechanical and clinical performance compared to traditional onlay glenoid components. Although there have been minimal clinical studies investigating the inset glenoid in comparison to onlay and inlay components to date, a subset of case series with short-term follow-up have demonstrated favorable outcomes. The purpose of this article was to review the design rationale, biomechanical evidence, and clinical performance of the inset glenoid component.

Indexed as

inlay glenoidinset glenoidinverted shouldertotal shoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40869646
PMCPMC12386770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.