ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
A Scoping Review of Clinical Features and Mechanisms of Orofacial Pain and Headache in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Differences Related to Neck Pain in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Genes · 2025Article
- Perceptions and Experiences of Physiotherapists Treating Trismus in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Findings from a Spanish Web-Based Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrofacial pain (OFP) and headache are common and disabling conditions in people with head and neck cancer (HNC), although their clinical characteristics and underlying pain mechanisms remain poorly studied, leading to worse diagnosis and, thus, management. Therefore, this review aims to synthesize the literature regarding clinical features, pain descriptors, mechanisms, and assessment tools of OFP and/or headache in adults with HNC.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Quantitative and qualitative original studies were included. Data were charted and summarized using narrative synthesis.
resultsOf 3647 records initially retrieved, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were observational and heterogeneous in design, population, and pain assessment methods. OFP was highly prevalent, with neuropathic descriptors (e.g., burning, electric shocks, tingling) reported in 13.1% to 64.5% of patients, although heterogeneity in study design and tools used to assess this potential pain mechanism was high. Pain was frequently localized at the tumor site, although pain in other regions beyond the head and neck was also reported. Pain intensity was generally moderate, although varied across studies. OFP and headache in HNC patients were often neuropathic in nature and contributed significantly to disability and reduced quality of life. Most articles lacked mechanistic classifications of pain, although some suggested that central sensitization may be involved in some patients.
conclusionsOrofacial pain and headache are prevalent, under-characterized symptoms in HNC patients. There is an urgent need for standardized assessments using validated tools to improve phenotyping and inform targeted treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.