ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Prevalence and Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Evidence and Emerging Research Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Documented Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Cardiometabolic Phenotype, and Rhythm-Related Outcomes After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Observational Cohort Study.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Arrhythmia: A Narrative Review of Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond the Apnea-Hypopnea Index: Circulating Biomarkers and Device-Based Metrics for Cardiometabolic Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of CPAP Therapy Adherence on Time to First Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lifestyle modification in atrial fibrillation: Mechanisms, phenotypes and ablation outcomes.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
- Validation and implementation of ambulatory obstructive sleep apnea polygraphy screening combined with wearable semi-continuous heart rhythm monitoring in patients with atrial fibrillation: a validation and a pilot study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed sleep disorder with significant cardiovascular implications, namely in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Despite its clinical relevance, OSA prevalence among AF patients and the diagnostic strategies used remain heterogeneous across studies, complicating screening, and treatment pathways. Our aim was to synthesize recent evidence on OSA prevalence in AF populations and to critically evaluate the diagnostic methods and screening strategies employed in clinical studies, by conducting a systematic review using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify original clinical studies published between January-2019 and December-2024. Inclusion criteria targeted adult AF populations assessed for OSA or sleep-disordered breathing. The results were analyzed by two independent reviewers. Non-concordances were resolved by consensus. Data extracted included study characteristics, population profiles, diagnostic approaches, prevalence rates, symptom profiles, and clinical correlates. Thirty-eight studies were included, comprising predominantly observational studies. Prevalence estimates of OSA in AF populations ranged from 5% to 90%, with most studies reporting rates > 60%. A consistent burden of moderate-to-severe OSA was observed. Diagnostic methods varied widely, from polysomnography (PSG) and home sleep apnea testing to pacemaker-derived monitoring and questionnaires such as STOP-Bang and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Underdiagnosis was attributed to minimal symptomatology, lack of physician awareness, and reliance on subjective tools. Several studies highlighted the limited sensitivity of standard screening instruments in AF populations and advocated for objective testing even in asymptomatic patients. Marked heterogeneity in study designs, diagnostic methods, and populations precluded quantitative synthesis and limited direct comparisons. Objective diagnostic testing, particularly PSG, is essential to improve OSA detection rates and guide individualized management. Integration of structured screening protocols into AF care-especially for high-risk patients-and interdisciplinary collaboration are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.