ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Neuroanatomical and Functional Correlates in Bipolar Disorder (BD): A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- White Matter Tract Alterations in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Nonlinear Adaptive Control of Bipolar Mood Disorder: A New Approach for Quenching the Mood Swing.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- An Integrated Treatment Approach for Bipolar II Disorder: A Clinical Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of mood disorders in the general population is quite high. Among the most common is bipolar disorder (BD), often associated with severe mood disorders, psychotic changes (e.g., delusions, hallucinations), impulsivity, and self-harm. However, its correct diagnosis is challenging, primarily due to the heterogeneity of clinical and symptomatic features, as well as individual differences among patients, such as comorbidity with other disorders (e.g., borderline personality disorder). Therefore, to improve understanding of its etiology and pathogenesis, refining the diagnosis must be a priority. Given the breadth and complexity of the evidence in the literature, we believe it is useful to provide a clear and comprehensive summary of the neuroanatomical and dysfunctional alterations observed, with particular attention to the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, cerebral ventricles, amygdala, hippocampus, cerebellum, and white matter. Through functional neuroimaging investigations it is possible to distinguish two main forms of bipolarism: the first (BD-I) is the most severe form, both in terms of manifested symptoms and in the structural and functional alterations detected; the second (BD-II) is the less severe form, which presents attenuated symptoms and mild or medium-severe alterations compared to the normotype criteria. Literature highlights the need to identify a precise study model, whether neuro-evolutionary or neuro-progressive or mixed, capable of offering clinical therapists greater scientific basis on which to anchor their diagnostic interpretations, and certainly the use of functional neuroimaging technology can be a good option even if it still presents costs that are not easily and freely sustainable by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.