ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Why Every Asthma Patient Tells a Different Story.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma has traditionally been viewed as a single disease, but recent research reveals its clinical and molecular complexity. This perspective highlights the need to shift from a traditional, uniform treatment paradigm to one that embraces the heterogeneity of asthma across individuals. Each patient presents a unique clinical story shaped by a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, developmental programming during critical early-life windows, the influence of sex and hormones, and lifelong environmental exposures. Asthma comprises multiple subtypes with distinct clinical and biological features. Furthermore, lifestyle factors such as obesity and smoking, along with highly prevalent comorbidities like allergic rhinitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, significantly modify the disease's course and response to treatment. This article explores how classifying the disease into clinical phenotypes (observable characteristics) and molecular endotypes (underlying mechanisms)-particularly the distinction between T2-high and T2-low inflammation-provides a crucial framework for managing this complexity. The application of this framework, guided by biomarkers, has enabled the development of targeted biologic therapies that can transform care for specific patient subgroups. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. The pathophysiology of certain subgroups, particularly non-T2 asthma, remains poorly defined, and there is an urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers to guide therapy and monitor outcomes. It is our opinion that future studies must adopt a systems-biology strategy, with a multi-omics approach that constructs a comprehensive molecular profile of each patient. This integrative methodology will require the use of advanced computational methods, including machine learning and artificial intelligence, to decipher the complex pathways linking genetic and environmental inputs to clinical disease. In conclusion, this article argues for a more personalized understanding of asthma, urging clinicians and researchers to consider each patient's unique clinical presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.