Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869405›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Cell-Free DNA Based Next-Generation Sequencing Does Not Differentiate Between Oligoprogression and Systemic Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-An Explorative Study.

Pim Rozendal, Hanneke Kievit, Paul van der Leest, Idris Bahce, Michiel Pegtel, Harry J M Groen, Léon C van Kempen, T Jeroen N Hiltermann, Ed Schuuring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pim RozendalDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0741-2249
Hanneke KievitDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paul van der LeestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Idris BahceDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-608X
Michiel PegtelDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harry J M GroenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2978-5265
Léon C van KempenDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-0705
T Jeroen N HiltermannDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0665-2160
Ed SchuuringDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-143X

Funding

Roche Netherlands Roche ovk-18882.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients will ultimately experience disease progression due to acquired resistance to ICI. Clinically, it is relevant to differentiate between systemic progression (SP) and oligoprogression (OP). Following SP, ICI treatment is usually discontinued, while in OP, patients are preferably treated with local ablative treatment with continuation of the ICI treatment. However, with progressive disease, it remains difficult to differentiate between true OP or SP. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis provides an accurate real-time reflection of the tumor burden. It remains elusive if ctDNA abundance and/or dynamics can discriminate between OP and SP. Therefore, the aim of this exploratory cohort study is to evaluate whether the sequential molecular tumor profiling of ctDNA is suitable for discriminating between true OP and SP in advanced NSCLC. Patients with stage III/IV NSCLC showing progression after ≥3 months of ICI were included. OP was defined retrospectively by RECIST response ≥ 6 months after local treatment and continued ICIs. Serial plasma samples were analyzed using the AVENIO ctDNA Expanded NGS assay targeting 77 cancer-related genes. Twenty patients (6 OP, 14 SP) were included. Somatic alterations were detected in 16 patients (median 4 mutations). No significant differences in baseline ctDNA levels, changes at progression, or mutation patterns were observed between OP and SP. Although ctDNA levels generally decreased early after the start of ICI treatment, and were increased at disease progression, mutational profiles of the 77 genes using the AVENIO Expanded ctDNA panel did not distinguish OP from SP.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)next-generation sequencing (NGS)non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)oligoprogression

Identifiers

PMID40869405
PMCPMC12386807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.