ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Optimization of Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology: The Role of Light Fractionation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming Biophysical Barriers in Melanoma Photomedicine: From Photodynamic Therapy to Smart Nanodelivery and Photoimmunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Photodynamic Therapy in Cancer: Mechanisms, Photosensitizer Technology, Vitamin Modulation, and Rational Combination Design.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Context-Dependent Mechanisms of Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: A Framework Linking Treatment Parameters to Cellular, Vascular, and Immune Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted photodynamic diagnosis and photodynamic therapy against cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has become a widely used modality for treating actinic keratosis (AK) and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC), as well as other inflammatory or infectious diseases. Despite its efficacy, limitations such as incomplete responses and pain have motivated the exploration of protocol enhancements. This review examines the clinical and biological rationale for light fractionation-dividing the total light dose into two separate exposures with a dark interval-as a strategy to improve PDT outcomes. We reviewed preclinical and clinical studies evaluating fractionated illumination using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL). The findings consistently demonstrate superior efficacy of fractionated schemes, particularly with ALA, showing higher complete response rates in AK, superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), and Bowen's disease (BD), and improved long-term tumor control compared to single illumination. The better outcomes are attributed to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation following tissue reoxygenation during the dark interval and greater susceptibility of partially damaged cells to subsequent illumination. Fractionated PDT also shows a favorable safety and cosmetic profile. These results support considering light fractionation protocols as a standard approach for optimizing PDT efficacy in dermatologic oncology, particularly in lesions with limited depth and high recurrence risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.