ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Cytidine and dCMP Deaminases-Current Methods of Activity Analysis.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiating hemorrhagic shock and organophosphate poisoning through integrated skin microbiome-metabolome signatures.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- A hybrid RNA-based reporter assay for robust quantification of cytidine deaminase activity.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Capecitabine Bioactivation Genes and Their Contribution to Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Investigating the molecular mechanisms of resveratrol in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a comprehensive analysis of network pharmacology and experiment validation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytidine deaminase (CDA) and deoxycytidine monophosphate deaminase (DCTD) play crucial roles in pyrimidine metabolism, affecting DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression, and the efficacy of numerous nucleoside analog-based chemotherapeutics. Given their significance, accurate and sensitive measurement of their enzymatic activity is paramount for both fundamental biochemical research and clinical applications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the methodologies used to assess CDA and DCTD activity, both established and emerging. We systematically categorize and discuss various approaches, including spectrophotometric, fluorimetric, liquid chromatography-based (Ultraviolet-Visible, fluorescence, and mass spectrometry), radiometric, and cell-based assays. For each method, we present its underlying principles, advantages, and limitations. Furthermore, we draw comparisons across the techniques to highlight their suitability for specific research questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.