Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869360›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Effect of PGPRs on the Rhizosphere Microbial Community Structure and Yield of Silage Maize in Saline-Alkaline Fields.

Weisong Zhao, Shezeng Li, Wei Yang, Naqi Cui, Xiuyun Lu, Shaojing Mo, Qinggang Guo, Ping Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weisong ZhaoKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Shezeng LiKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3672-6685
Wei YangKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Naqi CuiKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Xiuyun LuKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Shaojing MoKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Qinggang GuoKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.
Ping MaKey Laboratory of IPM on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Integrated Pest Management Innovation Centre of Hebei Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, Baoding 071000, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1901300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria, PGPR, can protect plants against soil-borne diseases and abiotic stress conditions. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different PGPRs (TF1, TF2, TF3, and TF4) on the rhizosphere microbial community of silage maize in a saline-alkaline field via Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology. Results demonstrated that different PGPRs significantly increased the harvest density (by 21.31-45.16%), plant height (by 9.12-19.98%), stem diameter (by 30.07-45.78%), and biomass (by 33.20-65.36%) of silage maize, TF3 treatment significantly increased the fresh weight (by 32.50%), while the other treatments could increase the fresh weight but not significantly. Four microbial agents significantly reduced the contents of soil available phosphorus (AP), electrical conductivity (EC), and neutral phosphatase activity (NPA), while significantly increasing the contents of available potassium (AK), ammonium nitrogen (NH

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalMicrobiotaRhizosphereSilageSoilSoil MicrobiologyZea maysAmmonium CompoundsChitinasesCrop ProductionElectric ConductivityNitrogenPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphorusPotassiumSalinityAmmonium CompoundsChitinasesNitrogenPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphorusPotassiumSoilmicrobial community structurePGPRrhizosphere microbiomesaline-alkaline soilssilage maizesoil nutrients

Identifiers

PMID40869360
PMCPMC12387046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.