ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
MXene-Based Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting: Material Design, Surface Modulation, and Catalytic Performance.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MOF-MXene composites: a new era of high-efficiency electrocatalysts.RSC advances · 2026Review
- A Review of Transition Metal Phosphides for Hydrazine-Assisted Electrolytic Water Splitting for Hydrogen Production.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Surface coordination chemistry of MXenes: defects, terminations and anchored metal sites for inorganic redox catalysis.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Sequential Ni-Pt Decoration on Co(OH)Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unlocking the Cu-Co Interplay: Electrodeposited Spinel CoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in MXene-Based Composites for Their Efficiency in the Degradation of Antibiotics and Water Splitting.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing efficient and sustainable hydrogen production technologies is critical for advancing the global clean energy transition. This review highlights recent progress in the design, synthesis, and electrocatalytic applications of MXene-based materials for electrochemical water splitting. It discusses the fundamental mechanisms of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and the structure-function relationships that govern electrocatalytic behavior. Emphasis is placed on the intrinsic structural and surface properties of MXenes, such as their layered architecture and tunable surface chemistry, which render them promising candidates for electrocatalysis. Despite these advantages, several practical limitations hinder their full potential, including oxidation susceptibility, restacking, and a limited number of active sites. Several studies have addressed these challenges using diverse engineering strategies, such as heteroatom doping; surface functionalization; and constructing MXene-based composites with metal chalcogenides, oxides, phosphides, and conductive polymers. These modifications have significantly improved catalytic activity, charge transfer kinetics, and long-term operational stability under various electrochemical conditions. Finally, this review outlines key knowledge gaps and emerging research directions, including defect engineering, single-atom integration, and system-level design, to accelerate the development of MXene-based electrocatalysts for sustainable hydrogen production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.