ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
New Frontiers in 3D Printing Using Biocompatible Polymers.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Gel Delivery Systems in Dental Medicine: From Controlled Release to Regenerative Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biocompatible polymers have emerged as essential materials in medical 3D printing, enabling the fabrication of scaffolds, tissue constructs, drug delivery systems, and biosensors for applications in and on the human body. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of 3D-printable biocompatible polymers and their composites, with an emphasis on their processing methods, properties, and biomedical uses. The scope of this work includes both natural and synthetic biocompatible polymers, polymer-nanocomposite systems, and bioinks that do not require photo initiators. The relevant literature was critically examined to classify materials by type, evaluate their compatibility with major 3D printing techniques such as stereolithography, selective laser sintering, and fused deposition modeling, and assess their performance in various medical applications. Key findings highlight that reinforced polymer composites, tailored surface chemistries, and hybrid printing strategies significantly expand the range of functional, customizable, and affordable biomedical devices. This review concludes by discussing present-day applications and emerging trends, underscoring that 3D-printable biocompatible polymers are rapidly transitioning from research to clinical practice, offering transformative potential for patient-specific healthcare solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.