ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Importin α3 Is Tolerant to Nuclear Localization Signal Chirality.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling nuclear localization signals in human arginine deiminase proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several carrier proteins are involved in nuclear translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in eukaryotic cells. We have previously demonstrated the binding of several intact folded and disordered proteins to the human isoform importin α3 (Impα3); furthermore, disordered peptides, corresponding to their nuclear localization signals (NLSs), also interact with Impα3. These proteins and their isolated NLSs also bind to the truncated importin species ∆Impα3, which does not contain the N-terminal disordered importin binding domain (IBB). In this work, we added a further 'layer' of conformational disorder to our studies, testing whether the isolated D-enantiomers of NLSs of selected proteins, either folded or unfolded, were capable of binding to both Impα3 and ∆Impα3. The D-enantiomers, like their L-form counterparts, were monomeric and disordered in isolation, as shown by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We measured the ability of such D-enantiomeric NLSs to interact with both importin species by using fluorescence, biolayer interferometry (BLI), isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and molecular simulations. In all cases, the binding affinities were within the same range as those measured for their L-isomer counterparts for either Impα3 or ∆Impα3, and the binding locations corresponded to the major NLS binding site of the protein. Thus, the stereoisomeric nature is not important in defining the binding of proteins to the main component of classical cellular translocation machinery, although the primary structure of the hot-spot site for NLS binding of importin is well defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.