Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40869013›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

The Role of Endobronchial Biopsies in Evaluating Biologic Therapy Response in Severe Asthma.

Agamemnon Bakakos, Dimitrios Ampazis, Andriana I Papaioannou, Stelios Loukides, Petros Bakakos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomarkers for selecting biologic therapies in asthma.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agamemnon Bakakos1st Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-6800
Dimitrios AmpazisRespiratory Department, Cavan & Monaghan Hospital & Chronic Disease Management Hub, HSE & RCSI University of Medicine, H12 Y7W1 Cavan, Ireland.
Andriana I Papaioannou1st Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9708-3241
Stelios Loukides2nd Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4278-9922
Petros Bakakos1st Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-9656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe asthma imposes a significant burden on public health worldwide, mainly due to its morbidity and high cost. The management of severe asthma has dramatically changed in the past few years with the introduction of biologics. Zero exacerbations, zero systemic corticosteroids, better asthma control, and better lung function are the outcomes that the era of biologics has made attainable in a large proportion of severe asthmatics, ending up in a better quality of life. Still, even today, the changes at the tissue level that reflect these outcomes are not that clear. As a chronic inflammatory disease, asthma often involves airway remodeling in its severe forms; endobronchial biopsies may provide critical insights into these tissue-level changes before and after biologic treatment. However, bronchoscopy is an invasive tool for severe asthma, thus limiting its use in daily clinical practice. This review focuses on summarizing the changes that biologics exert in biopsies obtained from severe asthmatics under biological treatment, providing an opportunity to shed light on what really happens there where it is not easy to see, and especially on what does not happen in patients under biologics who fail to respond as expected. Moreover, the armamentarium of biomarkers used for making the proper choice in patients eligible for more than one biologic needs to be enriched. Biopsy-related markers could be an ideal adjunct to the current ones-blood eosinophils, FeNO, and IgE-to assist the clinician to choose the right biologic for the right patient with severe asthma to achieve disease remission.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiological TherapyBronchiAirway RemodelingAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiomarkersBiopsyBronchoscopyHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiomarkersasthmabiologicsbiopsiessevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID40869013
PMCPMC12386950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.