ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Interobserver Agreement in Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Folate Receptor Alpha (FRα) in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicentre Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is a high-affinity folate transporter overexpressed in various epithelial malignancies, particularly high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Given its restricted expression in normal tissues and accessibility in tumors, FRα is an emerging therapeutic target. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the standard method for FRα assessment; however, interpretation is semi-quantitative and prone to interobserver variability. This study aimed to evaluate interobserver agreement among 12 pathologists in the IHC assessment of FRα in ovarian cancer, focusing on internal control adequacy, staining intensity, and the percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Thirty-seven high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma cases were stained using the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx Assay. A reference panel of four expert pathologists established consensus diagnoses. Twelve pathologists independently assessed the slides, recording internal control adequacy, staining intensity (positive vs. negative), and percentage of FRα-positive tumor cells. Interobserver agreement was measured using Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement on internal control adequacy was almost perfect (κ = 0.84). Substantial agreement was observed for staining intensity (κ = 0.76), while percentage estimation showed almost perfect concordance (ICC = 0.89). Discrepancies were primarily confined to borderline cases (65-85% positivity) and tumors with intermediate staining, reflecting interpretive challenges near clinical decision thresholds. Pathologists demonstrated high reproducibility in FRα IHC assessment, particularly in estimating percentage positivity and control adequacy. These findings support the clinical utility of FRα IHC but underscore the need for standardized scoring criteria and potential integration of digital tools to enhance consistency, especially in borderline cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.