Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40868914›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Impact of Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements on IVF Laboratory Outcomes in PGT-SR Cycles: A Propensity Score Matching-Based Study.

Daria Marzanati, Sara D'Alessandro, Davide Gentilini, Elisa Rabellotti, Laura Privitera, Sonia Faulisi, Francesca Spinella, Anil Biricik, Ettore Cotroneo, Massimo Candiani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Daria MarzanatiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-4004-2176
Sara D'AlessandroObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Davide GentiliniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Elisa RabellottiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Laura PriviteraObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Sonia FaulisiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Francesca SpinellaEurofins Genoma Group, 00138 Rome, Italy.
Anil BiricikEurofins Genoma Group, 00138 Rome, Italy.
Ettore CotroneoEurofins Genoma Group, 00138 Rome, Italy.
Massimo CandianiObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-2626
Luca PagliardiniDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3960-7454
Enrico PapaleoObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Alessandra AlteriObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-3546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal structural rearrangements (SR) can impair gametogenesis, increasing the risk of embryos carrying unbalanced chromosomal content (i.e., with a gain or loss of chromosomal material). In such cases, assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) is recommended to identify embryos with a normal or balanced karyotype. However, data on IVF laboratory outcomes in this context remain limited. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 548 ART cycles, comprising 129 with PGT-SR and 419 with PGT-A, conducted at a single university-affiliated center. Following propensity score matching, laboratory outcomes were compared using logistic regression. The fertilization rate was comparable between groups, but the PGT-SR group had significantly lower blastocyst development (36.7% vs. 47.1%) and top-quality blastocyst development rates (9.6% vs. 21.1%). No significant differences were found either in the blastocyst development rate on days 5, 6, 7, or in euploidy rates. In the PGT-SR cohort, the generalized linear mixed-effects model indicated no significant effect of carrier gender on the normal/balanced blastocyst rate, while the type of SR was strongly associated with it: non-reciprocal SRs yielded a higher rate of normal/balanced blastocysts (89.9%) compared to reciprocal translocations (45.7%). These findings indicate that patients undergoing PGT-SR generate fewer blastocysts available for biopsy, and that in cases involving reciprocal translocations, the proportion of normal/balanced blastocysts suitable for transfer is significantly reduced. These results underscore the importance of personalized counseling in managing expectations and supporting informed clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

blastocyst development ratePGT-SRreciprocal translocationstructural rearrangements

Identifiers

PMID40868914
PMCPMC12387454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.