ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Total Intravenous Anesthesia Using Target-Controlled Infusion with Propofol for Category 1 Emergency Cesarean Section in Patients with Preeclampsia with Severe Features.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Target-Controlled Infusion for Caesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: From Conventional Pharmacokinetic Models to Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrative Transcriptomic and Network Pharmacology Analysis Suggests Potential Mechanisms of Propofol in Early-Onset Preeclampsia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia with severe features presents major anesthetic challenges, particularly in category 1 cesarean sections, in which rapid, safe, and hemodynamically stable induction is critical. Neuraxial techniques may be controversial due to neurological symptoms, making general anesthesia a viable option. However, traditional general anesthesia may exacerbate hypertension and increase maternal and fetal risks. Two primigravida patients with elevated blood pressure and neurological symptoms underwent category 1 cesarean delivery under TIVA-TCI with propofol, using the Marsh model. Hemodynamic stability, drug dosing, and maternal-neonatal outcomes were monitored. Sufentanil was administered for analgesia; neuromuscular blockade was achieved with rocuronium and reversed with sugammadex. No BIS or TOF monitoring was available. Both patients maintained stable hemodynamics and oxygenation throughout surgery. Intubation was successfully performed at an effect-site concentration of 3.5 µg/mL. Neonatal Apgar scores were within acceptable limits. No major complications occurred intraoperatively or postoperatively. TCI allowed individualized dosing and smooth emergence. TIVA-TCI with propofol appears to be a viable alternative to volatile-based general anesthesia in category 1 emergencies for cesarean sections for patients with preeclampsia with severe features, especially when neuraxial anesthesia is controversial. It offers hemodynamic stability and controlled depth of anesthesia, though its use requires experience and may not be optimal in cases requiring ultra-rapid induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.