Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40868813›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy with Machine Learning: A Clinical, MRI-Qualitative, and Radiomics Approach.

Rami Hajri, Charles Aboudaram, Nathalie Lassau, Tarek Assi, Leony Antoun, Joana Mourato Ribeiro, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Samy Ammari, Corinne Balleyguier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rami HajriImaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0081-3162
Charles AboudaramImaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Nathalie LassauImaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-6513
Tarek AssiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Leony AntounDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Joana Mourato RibeiroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Magali Lacroix-TrikiDepartment of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.
Samy AmmariImaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-0714
Corinne BalleyguierImaging Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-8731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathological complete response (pCR) serves as a prognostic surrogate endpoint for long-term clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning-based biomarkers for predicting pCR and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

methodsThis retrospective monocentric study included 235 women (mean age 46 ± 11 years) with non-metastatic breast cancer treated with NAST. We developed various machine learning models using clinical features (age, genetic mutations, TNM stage, hormonal receptor expression, HER2 status, and histological grade), along with morphological features (size, T2 signal, and surrounding edema) and radiomics data extracted from pre-treatment MRI. Patients were divided into training and test groups with different MRI models. A customized machine learning pipeline was implemented to handle these diverse data types, consisting of feature selection and classification components.

resultsThe models demonstrated superior prediction ability using radiomics features, with the best model achieving an AUC of 0.72. Subgroup analysis revealed optimal performance in triple-negative breast cancer (AUC of 0.80) and HER2-positive subgroups (AUC of 0.65).

conclusionMachine learning models incorporating clinical, qualitative, and radiomics data from pre-treatment MRI can effectively predict pCR in breast cancer patients receiving NAST, particularly among triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer subgroups.

Indexed as

breast cancermachine learningneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responseradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40868813
PMCPMC12387129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.