ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Effects of Low-Load Resistance Training Combined with Blood Flow Restriction or Hypoxia on Cardiovascular Response: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low-load resistance training combined with vascular occlusion or hypoxia can increase muscle cross-sectional area (CSA), but the effect of such training on hormonal response and cardiovascular response is less clear. Thirty female netball athletes took part in a 5-week training of knee muscles in which low-load resistance exercise (20% 1-RM) was combined with either an occlusion pressure (KT, n = 10), hypoxic air (HT, n = 10), or no additional stimulus (CT, n = 10). Growth hormones (GHs), cardiovascular parameters, and CSA were measured before and after the training program. Compared to CT, both HT and KT showed a substantial increase in GH release after the first training bout (pre). After 5 weeks of training (post), the release of GH was substantially reduced in all groups. Compared to CT, HT showed a substantial decrease in SP (11.7 ± 11.3%, mean ± 90% CL) over the training period. The reduction in systolic blood pressure (SP) after hypoxic training resulted in a substantial decrease in the rate-pressure product (RPP) by 15.6 ± 9.6%, compared to CT. CSA from HT and KT is likely related to the heightened release of GH found after training. The hypoxic training protocol has a greater cardiovascular benefit than similar resistance training with blood flow restriction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.