ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clinical Reasoning and Practices in the Osteopathic Management of Visceral Disorders: A Grounded Theory Study in the Italian Context.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and rationaleVisceral disorders, both functional and organic, significantly impact health-related quality of life and pose a challenge for healthcare systems. Osteopathy offers manual, systemic, and patient-centered approaches for their management, yet these remain controversial due to limited scientific support and methodological inconsistencies. In the evolving landscape of healthcare regulation in Europe, and particularly in Italy, exploring clinical reasoning and operational models in visceral osteopathy is essential. This study aimed to explore the beliefs, clinical reasoning, and management strategies of experienced Italian osteopaths in the treatment of visceral disorders using a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach.
methodsThis qualitative study applied a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach to explore the beliefs and clinical practices of 10 experienced Italian osteopaths. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed, integrating literature comparisons to support theory generation.
resultsFour core themes emerged: (1) education and professional development, (2) definition and identification of visceral disorders, (3) clinical management strategies, and (4) multidisciplinary collaboration. The findings reveal marked heterogeneity in diagnostic frameworks and treatment rationales, often driven by tradition and subjective interpretation rather than empirical evidence. Palpatory assessments were frequently prioritized over patient-reported outcomes.
conclusionThe study highlights substantial fragmentation in Italian visceral osteopathic practice, echoing challenges across Europe. Promoting a shift towards critical thinking, evidence-based models, shared terminology, and interprofessional integration is essential for contextualising osteopathic contributions to the care of individuals presenting with visceral-related problems. These findings provide insights into the fragmented clinical practices of Italian osteopaths and may contribute to shaping a more critical and evidence-informed approach within Italian osteopathic practice and professional development, which is now more relevant than ever, given the recent integration of osteopathy into the Italian higher education system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.