ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of Biologic Therapy Switching to Optimize the Treatment of Severe Pediatric Asthma: Tezepelumab Is a New Therapeutic Alternative for Adolescents.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe emergence of biologic therapies has transformed the management of severe asthma, offering targeted treatments that improve symptom control and reduce exacerbations. However, taking a biologic solely based on the initial response may not be optimal. Clinicians must regularly reassess the suitability of the selected biologic, considering evolving patient characteristics and the growing availability of treatment options. This article aims to highlight the importance of individualized decision making in the long-term management of pediatric patients receiving biologic therapy, exploring the various reasons that may justify switching biologic treatment.
methodsWe present a case to illustrate this approach: a 14-year-old adolescent girl with severe allergic asthma who initially received Omalizumab, achieving clinical, laboratory, and functional improvements. Despite this positive response, the patient reported low-level satisfaction due to the frequency of injections and hospital visits, leading to poor adherence. After a comprehensive reassessment, the treatment was switched to Tezepelumab.
resultsFollowing the switch, the patient maintained stable disease control with a slight improvement in lung function, while adherence, satisfaction, and quality of life improved significantly. The number of hospital visits was reduced from 24 to 12 per year, and the number of injections decreased from 104 to 12 annually. The patient reported high-level satisfaction with the new treatment plan, and the economic burden of therapy was also substantially reduced. We present a table summarizing the essential and secondary factors to consider when initiating or switching biologic therapy.
conclusionsThis case highlights the need to go beyond the traditional criteria, such as lack of efficacy and adverse reactions, when evaluating a switch in biologic therapy for pediatric asthma. Factors such as comorbidities, injection frequency and number, route of administration, and cost should also be considered, as they can directly influence adherence and the clinical outcomes in children and adolescents. As the therapeutic options expand, regular reassessment and personalized adjustments remain essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.