Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40868524›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Lung Function Assessment in Pediatric Asthma: Selecting the Optimal Tests for Clinical and Research Applications.

Giulia Michela Pellegrino, Alessandro Gobbi, Marco Fantini, Riccardo Pellegrino, Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza Papa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giulia Michela PellegrinoDipartimento di Scienze Neuroriabilitative, Casa di Cura Igea, 20144 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-1269
Alessandro GobbiDipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-9567
Marco FantiniOtolaryngology Department, Ospedale Koelliker, 10134 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-6259
Riccardo PellegrinoCentro Medico Pneumologico Torino, Ospedale Koelliker, 10134 Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe Francesco Sferrazza PapaDipartimento di Scienze Neuroriabilitative, Casa di Cura Igea, 20144 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-4843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent documents from leading international pediatric respiratory societies have strongly encouraged the use of lung function tests in clinical practice and research. These tests can explore ventilatory function across its volumetric and temporal domains, providing information on the intrapulmonary location and extent of damage caused by respiratory diseases. The choice of which test to use in each case to investigate presenting respiratory symptoms depends on the patient's symptoms and the diagnostic-therapeutic phase being addresse d. In the most common and representative chronic pediatric condition-bronchial asthma-lung function tests play an especially important role due to the disease's complexity and the fluctuating nature of airway obstruction. This review aims to examine the potential of various lung function tests in asthma, helping clinicians and researchers to optimize diagnosis and follow-up with the most appropriate methodology. While spirometry and flow resistance measurements using the interrupter technique have historically been the cornerstones of diagnosis and clinical monitoring in childhood asthma, the advent of new technologies-such as multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) and the forced oscillation technique (FOT)-is opening up the door to a more nuanced view of the disease. These tools allow for an evaluation of asthma as a structurally complex and topographically and temporally disorganized condition. FOT, in particular, facilitates measurement acceptability in less cooperative subjects, both in respiratory physiology labs and even at the patient's home.

Indexed as

bronchodilator and bronchoconstrictor challengesdyspneaforced oscillation techniqueinterrupter techniquespirometrytopographical and temporal ventilation heterogeneitiesvocal cord dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40868524
PMCPMC12384821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.