ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multimodal Integration Enhances Tissue Image Information Content: A Deep Feature Perspective.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal imaging techniques have the potential to enhance the interpretation of histology by offering additional molecular and structural information beyond that accessible through hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining alone. Here, we present a quantitative approach for comparing the information content of different image modalities, such as H&E and multimodal imaging. We used a combination of deep learning and radiomics-based feature extraction with different information markers, implemented in Python 3.12, to compare the information content of the H&E stain, multimodal imaging, and the combined dataset. We also compared the information content of individual channels in the multimodal image and of different Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS) microscopy spectral channels. The quantitative measurements of information that we utilized were Shannon entropy, inverse area under the curve (1-AUC), the number of principal components describing 95% of the variance (PC95), and inverse power law fitting. For example, the combined dataset achieved an entropy value of 0.5740, compared to 0.5310 for H&E and 0.5385 for the multimodal dataset using MobileNetV2 features. The number of principal components required to explain 95 percent of the variance was also highest for the combined dataset, with 62 components, compared to 33 for H&E and 47 for the multimodal dataset. These measurements consistently showed that the combined datasets provide more information. These observations highlight the potential of multimodal combinations to enhance image-based analyses and provide a reproducible framework for comparing imaging approaches in digital pathology and biomedical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.