ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effects of Aging on Motor Unit Properties in Isometric Elbow Flexion.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older Adult Movement Assessment Through Rehabilitation Software for Upper Limb Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Aging impairs bimanual isometric force smoothness.EXCLI journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates age-related differences in motor unit (MU) properties and neuromuscular control during isometric elbow flexion across the human lifespan. High-density surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded from the biceps brachii of 44 participants, divided into three groups: Child (8-14 years), Adult (20-40 years), and Elder (65-80 years). MU spike trains were extracted noninvasively by sEMG decomposition. Then the discharge rate, MU action potential (MUAP) morphology, recruitment threshold, and common neural drive were quantified and compared across age groups. This study provides novel insights into force tracking performance, revealing that both children and elders exhibit higher errors compared to young adults, likely due to immature or declining motor control systems. Significant differences in MU discharge patterns were observed across force levels and age groups. Children and elders displayed lower MU discharge rates at low force levels, which increased at higher forces. In contrast, adults demonstrated higher MU action potential peak-to-peak amplitudes (PPV) and recruitment thresholds (RTs), along with steeper PPV-RT slopes, suggesting a narrower RT range in children and older adults. Principal component analysis revealed a strong correlation between common neural drive and force across all groups, with neural drive being weaker in elders. Overall, young adults exhibited the most efficient and synchronized MU control, while children and older adults showed distinct deviations in discharge intensity, recruitment strategies, and neural synergy. These findings comprehensively characterize MU adaptations across the lifespan, offering implications for developmental neurophysiology and age-specific neuromuscular diagnostics and interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.