ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Approach to Standardized Material Characterization of the Human Lumbopelvic System: Testing and Evaluation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The osseo-ligamentous lumbopelvic complex is essential for musculoskeletal load transfer, yet location-specific material data and standardized test protocols remain scarce, which is a hindrance for comparability. Based on 91 specimen locations per cadaver (five cadavers, average age: 77.3 years), we developed detailed methods for specimen preparation and mechanical testing (bending, tensile, and compression) with defined boundary conditions. Multiple measurements were taken to assess repeatability. The proposed methods allow us to identify location-specific properties of the lumbopelvic system for the first time. Cortical bone exhibited an elastic modulus of 1750 MPa and an ultimate strength of 28.2 MPa, while those of trabecular bone were 32.7 MPa and 1.26 MPa, and soft tissues revealed values of 148 MPa and 14.3 MPa for fascial tissue and 103 MPa with 10.7 MPa for ligamentous tissue, respectively. The quantified properties for cortical and trabecular bone and soft tissues not only enhance the comparability of material properties but also support more accurate numerical simulations and implant design. Furthermore, the ease of implementation and standardization of these methods enable their widespread application, as well as the accumulation of a broad database and the setting of benchmarks for future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.