ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Influence of Structure-Property Relationships of Polymeric Biomaterials for Engineering Multicellular Spheroids.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated 3D microstructured digital microfluidic platform for advanced 3D cell culture.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- An early-stage 3D fibroblast-featured tumor model mimics the gene expression of the naïve tumor microenvironment, including genes involved in cancer progression and drug resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two-dimensional cell culture systems lack the ability to replicate the complex, three-dimensional (3D) architecture and cellular microenvironments found in vivo. Multicellular spheroids (MCSs) present a promising alternative, with the ability to mimic native cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and provide 3D architectures similar to in vivo conditions. These factors are critical for various biomedical applications, including cancer research, tissue engineering, and drug discovery and development. Polymeric materials such as hydrogels, solid scaffolds, and ultra-low attachment surfaces serve as versatile platforms for 3D cell culture, offering tailored biochemical and mechanical cues to support cellular organization. This review article focuses on the structure-property relationships of polymeric biomaterials that influence MCS formation, growth, and functionality. Specifically, we highlight their physicochemical properties and their influence on spheroid formation using key natural polymers, including collagen, hyaluronic acid, chitosan, and synthetic polymers like poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) as examples. Despite recent advances, several challenges persist, including spheroid loss during media changes, limited viability or function in long-term cultures, and difficulties in scaling for high-throughput applications. Importantly, the development of MCS platforms also supports the 3R principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) by offering ethical and physiologically relevant alternatives to animal testing. This review emphasizes the need for innovative biomaterials and methodologies to overcome these limitations, ultimately advancing the utility of MCSs in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.