ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing Trauma Care: Machine Learning-Based Photoplethysmography Analysis for Estimating Blood Volume During Hemorrhage and Resuscitation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in trauma care, requiring rapid and accurate detection to guide effective interventions. Hemorrhagic shock can be masked by underlying compensatory mechanisms, which may lead to delayed decision-making that can compromise casualty care. In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict Percent Estimated Blood Loss from a photoplethysmography waveform, offering non-invasive, field deployable solutions. Different model types were tuned and optimized using data captured during a hemorrhage and resuscitation swine study. Through this optimization process, we evaluated different time-lengths of prediction windows, machine learning model architectures, and data normalization approaches. Models were successful at predicting Percent Estimated Blood Loss in blind swine subjects with coefficient of determination values exceeding 0.8. This provides evidence that Percent Estimated Blood Loss can be accurately derived from non-invasive signals, improving its utility for trauma care and casualty triage in the pre-hospital and emergency medicine environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.