ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Radiologic Assessment of Periprostatic Fat as an Indicator of Prostate Cancer Risk on Multiparametric MRI.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies among men, and emerging evidence proposed a potential role for periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) in tumor progression. However, its relationship with imaging-based risk stratification systems such as PI-RADS remains uncertain. This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate whether periprostatic and subcutaneous fat thickness are associated with PI-RADS scores or PSA levels in biopsy-naïve patients. We retrospectively reviewed 104 prostate MRI scans performed between January 2020 and January 2024. Fat thickness was measured on axial T2-weighted images, and statistical analyses were conducted using Spearman's correlation and multiple linear regression. In addition to linear measurements, we also assessed periprostatic fat volume and posterior fat thickness derived from imaging data. No significant correlations were observed between fat thickness (either periprostatic or subcutaneous) and PI-RADS score or PSA values. Similarly, periprostatic fat volume showed only a weak, non-significant correlation with PI-RADS, while posterior fat thickness demonstrated a weak but statistically significant positive association. Additionally, subgroup comparisons between low-risk (PI-RADS < 4) and high-risk (PI-RADS ≥ 4) patients showed no meaningful differences in fat measurements. These findings suggest that simple linear fat thickness measurements may not enhance imaging-based risk assessment in prostate cancer, though regional and volumetric assessments could offer modest added value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.