ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Robust Segmentation of Lung Proton and Hyperpolarized Gas MRI with Vision Transformers and CNNs: A Comparative Analysis of Performance Under Artificial Noise.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking Hybrid CNN-Transformer Versus Pure Transformer Architectures for Accelerated HyperpolarizedJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence standardizes CT-based body composition analysis in breast cacer to address methodological heterogeneity.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Foundational, Advanced, and Traditional Deep Learning Models for Hyperpolarized Gas MRI Lung Segmentation: Robust Performance in Data-Constrained Scenarios.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation in medical imaging is essential for disease diagnosis and monitoring, particularly in lung imaging using proton and hyperpolarized gas MRI. However, image degradation due to noise and artifacts-especially in hyperpolarized gas MRI, where scans are acquired during breath-holds-poses challenges for conventional segmentation algorithms. This study evaluates the robustness of deep learning segmentation models under varying Gaussian noise levels, comparing traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with modern Vision Transformer (ViT)-based models. Using a dataset of proton and hyperpolarized gas MRI slices from 56 participants, we trained and tested Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) and U-Net architectures with both CNN (VGG16, VGG19, ResNet152) and ViT (MiT-B0, B3, B5) backbones. Results showed that ViT-based models, particularly those using the SegFormer backbone, consistently outperformed CNN-based counterparts across all metrics and noise levels. The performance gap was especially pronounced in high-noise conditions, where transformer models retained higher Dice scores and lower boundary errors. These findings highlight the potential of ViT-based architectures for deployment in clinically realistic, low-SNR environments such as hyperpolarized gas MRI, where segmentation reliability is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.