ReviewBiomedicines2025
Glioblastoma: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of CAR-T-Cell-Based Immunotherapies in Patients With Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating "brain permeability": A critical issue for the development of therapeutic agents for primary and metastatic brain tumors.Neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- CAR-T cells immunotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Despite the current standard of care therapy, including maximal surgical resection, chemoradiation, and tumor-treating fields, prognosis remains poor. Therapeutic failure is driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, poor drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier, and robust resistance mechanisms. Epigenetic alterations further compound treatment resistance by enhancing DNA repair and promoting survival pathways. Molecular profiling has identified key prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Gene expression analyses have delineated GBM subtypes, each with distinct molecular features and therapeutic vulnerabilities that hinder successful clinical translation. This review integrates the pathophysiological, diagnostic, and therapeutic landscape of GBM to inform of future strategies for improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.