ReviewBiomedicines2025
Transforming Spinal Muscular Atrophy: From Pivotal Trials to Real-World Evidence and Future Therapeutic Frontiers in Types 1 and 2.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis ofBiomedicines · 2026Article
- RNA-Based Therapeutics in Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Bridging Molecular Genetics and Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Ceftriaxone-ResistantClinical case reports · 2026Article
- Nanotube-Assisted Motor Neuron and Neuromuscular Junction Stabilization in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Hypothesis for Adjunctive Therapy.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Novel Translational Concept: Axon-to-Muscle Exosomal Signaling as an Emerging Therapeutic Target in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Quebec Spinal Muscular Atrophy Newborn Screening Program: The First Year Experience.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder and a leading genetic cause of infant mortality. The past decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in SMA management with the advent of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). This narrative review aims to (i) summarize pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that led to the approval of DMDs for SMA Types 1 and 2; (ii) synthesize real-world evidence on their safety and effectiveness; and (iii) explore emerging therapeutic frontiers, including gene modifiers, predictive biomarkers, prenatal interventions, and combination strategies. Pivotal RCTs and real-world studies demonstrate that onasemnogene abeparvovec (a single-dose gene therapy), nusinersen (an intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide), and risdiplam (an oral SMN2 splicing modifier) each significantly improve survival and motor function milestones compared to natural history in Type 1 and Type 2 SMA, with the majority of treated patients achieving independent sitting and prolonged ventilator-free survival, while safety profiles are generally manageable and distinct for each therapy. Similar outcomes have been demonstrated for presymptomatic patients with SMA. The introduction of DMDs has transformed the prognosis of SMA, particularly for early-onset forms, with robust evidence supporting their efficacy and safety. Continued real-world monitoring and exploration of adjunctive therapies are essential to optimize outcomes across the SMA setting and address unmet needs in non-responders and older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.