Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40868143›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Focused Modulation of Brain Activity: A Narrative Review.

Aisha Zhantleuova, Altynay Karimova, Anna P Andreou, Almira M Kustubayeva, Rashid Giniatullin, Bazbek Davletov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aisha ZhantleuovaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty A15E3C7, Kazakhstan.
Altynay KarimovaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty A15E3C7, Kazakhstan.
Anna P AndreouHeadache Research, Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-6626
Almira M KustubayevaDepartment of Biophysics, Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty A15E3C7, Kazakhstan.
Rashid GiniatullinA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 80101 Kuopio, Finland.
Bazbek DavletovNeuresta, Inc., San Diego, CA 91991, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4658-3275

Funding

Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR27198099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide range of strategies have been developed to modulate dysfunctional brain activities. This narrative review provides a comparative analysis of biophysical, genetic, and biological neuromodulation approaches with an emphasis on their known or unknown molecular targets and translational potential. The review incorporates data from both preclinical and clinical studies covering deep brain stimulation, transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation, focused ultrasound, chemogenetics, optogenetics, magnetogenetics, and toxin-based neuromodulation. Each method was assessed based on specificity, safety, reversibility, and mechanistic clarity. Biophysical methods are widely used in clinical practice but often rely on empirical outcomes due to undefined molecular targets. Genetic tools offer cell-type precision in experimental systems but face translational barriers related to delivery and safety. Biological agents, such as botulinum neurotoxins, provide long-lasting yet reversible inhibition via well-characterized molecular pathways. However, they require stereotaxic injections and remain invasive. To overcome individual limitations and improve targeting, delivery, and efficacy, there is a growing interest in the synthesis of multiple approaches. This review highlights a critical gap in the mechanistic understanding of commonly used methods. Addressing this gap by identifying molecular targets may help to improve therapeutic precision. This concise review could be valuable for researchers looking to enter the evolving field of the neuromodulation of brain function.

Indexed as

chemogeneticsdeep brain stimulationfocused ultrasound stimulationmagnetogeneticsneuromodulationoptogeneticstoxinstranscranial electrical stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40868143
PMCPMC12383810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.