Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867996›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Targeting Bacterial Biofilms on Medical Implants: Current and Emerging Approaches.

Alessandro Calogero Scalia, Ziba Najmi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effect of sonication on staphylococcal and gram-negative biofilms relevant to prosthetic joint infections: an in vitro study.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. ZrOJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CRISPR-driven strategies to disrupt methicillin-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessandro Calogero ScaliaDepartment of Health Sciences, Center for Translational Research on Autoimmune & Allergic Diseases, CAAD, University of Piemonte Orientale, Corso Trieste 15/A, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6123-6127
Ziba NajmiDepartment of Health Sciences, Center for Translational Research on Autoimmune & Allergic Diseases, CAAD, University of Piemonte Orientale, Corso Trieste 15/A, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6192-2258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms are structured communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced extracellular matrix, and they represent one of the most widespread forms of microbial life on Earth. Their presence poses serious challenges in both environmental and clinical settings. In natural and industrial systems, biofilms contribute to water contamination, pipeline corrosion, and biofouling. Clinically, biofilm-associated infections are responsible for approximately 80% of all microbial infections, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, cystic fibrosis, and chronic sinusitis. A particularly critical concern is their colonization of medical devices, where biofilms can lead to chronic infections, implant failure, and increased mortality. Implantable devices, such as orthopedic implants, cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, urinary catheters, and hernia meshes, are highly susceptible to microbial attachment and biofilm development. These infections are often recalcitrant to conventional antibiotics and frequently necessitate surgical revision. In the United States, over 500,000 biofilm-related implant infections occur annually, with prosthetic joint infections alone projected to incur revision surgery costs exceeding USD 500 million per year-a figure expected to rise to USD 1.62 billion by 2030. To address these challenges, surface modification of medical devices has emerged as a promising strategy to prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. This review focuses on recent advances in chemical surface functionalization using non-antibiotic agents, such as enzymes, chelating agents, quorum sensing quenching factors, biosurfactants, oxidizing compounds and nanoparticles, designed to enhance antifouling and mature biofilm eradication properties. These approaches aim not only to prevent device-associated infections but also to reduce dependence on antibiotics and mitigate the development of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

EPSmatrix eradicationmedical devicenon-antibiotic agents

Identifiers

PMID40867996
PMCPMC12382947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.