ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study.
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli sepsis according to infection site.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a second-generation intravenous β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. In recent years, substantial evidence has emerged regarding the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI. However, data on its use in critically ill patients remain limited. BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted across four Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in three hospitals in the Marche region of Italy. The primary objective was to evaluate the 30-day clinical outcomes and identify risk factors associated with 30-day clinical failure-defined as death, microbiological recurrence, or persistence within 30 days after discontinuation of therapy-in critically ill patients treated with CAZ-AVI.
methodsThe study included all adult critically ill patients admitted to the participating ICUs between January 2020 and September 2023 who received CAZ-AVI for at least 72 h for the treatment of a confirmed or suspected Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infection.
resultsAmong the 161 patients included in the study, CAZ-AVI treatment resulted in a positive clinical outcome (i.e., clinical improvement and 30-day survival) in 58% of cases (n = 93/161), while the overall mortality rate was 24% (n = 38/161). Relapse or persistent infection occurred in a substantial proportion of patients (25%, n = 41/161). Notably, acquired resistance to CAZ-AVI was observed in 26% of these cases, likely due to suboptimal use of the drug in relation to its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties in critically ill patients. Furthermore, treatment failure was more frequent among immunosuppressed individuals, particularly liver transplant recipients.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that the mortality rate among ICU patients treated with this novel antimicrobial combination is consistent with findings from other studies involving heterogeneous populations. However, the rapid emergence of resistance underscores the need for vigilant surveillance and the implementation of robust antimicrobial stewardship strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.