ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics-Based Repositioning of Cefmetazole and Flomoxef in Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Treatment: An Injectable Carbapenem-Sparing and Outpatient Strategy.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk-Stratified Effectiveness of Cephamycins Versus Carbapenems for ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Single-Dose Flomoxef Prophylaxis for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Study of 834 Cases.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Pre-Target Interception Defines Carbapenem Failure in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Mechanistic Framework for Spatiotemporal Drug Reprogramming.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in the Era of Climate Change: Why We Should All Embrace and Integrate the One Health Approach in Clinical Practice?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-Es) pose a significant global threat with notable increases in prevalence worldwide. Carbapenems are often used as the first line of treatment. However, their overuse accelerates resistance development, highlighting the urgent need for clinically viable carbapenem-sparing strategies. Cefmetazole (CMZ) and flomoxef (FMOX) are parenteral antibiotics that are widely used in Japan and have emerged as potential carbapenem alternatives. Repositioning these agents effectively addresses the clinical need for carbapenem-sparing strategies and outpatient ESBL-E management. This review aims to reposition CMZ and FMOX for real-world clinical practice by synthesizing basic research, clinical studies, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKs/PDs) analyses, which suggest that these agents may be effective in treating ESBL-E infections-particularly urinary tract infections, as evidenced by their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. The clinical outcomes of these interventions have been comparable to those of carbapenems, which support their role in antimicrobial stewardship. Their PK/PD characteristics emphasize the importance of dose optimization to ensure therapeutic efficacy, whereas recent insights into resistance mechanisms provide a foundation for appropriate use. As novel antibiotic development takes substantial time, revisiting existing options is increasingly important. Notably, the Infectious Diseases Society of America's 2024 guidance on antimicrobial resistance has omitted CMZ and FMOX, owing to which clinicians have limited guidance on their use, particularly in regions like Japan where these antibiotics are widely employed. By addressing this knowledge gap, the present review offers a comprehensive evaluation of these drugs and highlights their potential as intravenous agents in ESBL-E management. Furthermore, it highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring effective oral step-down therapy in an outpatient setting to reinforce the global relevance of CMZ and FMOX in a broader treatment framework, underscoring their potential for outpatient administration where clinically appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.