Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867877›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Synergistic Effects of Antioxidant Blends: A Comparative Study on Oxidative Stability of Lipids in Feed Matrices.

Xuyang Gao, Yong Xiao, Wen Li, Liting Xu, Jianmin Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuyang GaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0009-0009-9365-847X
Yong XiaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100193, China.
Wen LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100193, China.
Liting XuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100193, China.
Jianmin YuanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-5296

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China NK2024040505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid peroxidation driven by polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) oxidation compromises feed quality and animal health. Single antioxidants (e.g., ethoxyquin (EQ), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)) face limitations including dose-dependent toxicity, bioaccumulation risks, and inadequate protection against multistage oxidation. Composite systems leveraging complementary mechanisms offer a promising alternative. This study evaluated synergistic efficacy of rationally formulated composite antioxidants (combining synthetic radical scavengers and metal chelators) versus single-component systems in enhancing lipid oxidative stability in high-fat animal feed. The basal diet containing oxidized oil served as the control group (CON). Seven groups were supplemented with the basal diet as follows: Treatment A, 36 g/ton Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT); Treatment B, 60 g/ton Ethoxyquin (EQ); Treatment C, 132 g/ton EQ; Treatment D, 10 g/ton EQ + 12 g/ton BHT; Treatment E, 10 g/ton EQ + 12 g/ton BHT + 6 g/ton Citric acid (CA); Treatment F, 20 g/ton EQ + 6 g/ton BHT + 6 g/ton CA; and treatment G, 2 g/ton EQ + 25 g/ton BHT + 6 g/ton CA. Oxidative stability was assessed over a 10-week period under natural storage (T0-T10) and acute thermal stress (120 °C drying for 2 h followed by ambient storage; HT0 to HT10). Oxidative stability was assessed via: antioxidant capacity (DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)/ABTS (2,2'-Azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) scavenging, total antioxidant capacity), physical indices: Color (L*, a*, b*), and chemical oxidation markers: conjugated dienes (CD), peroxide value (PV), p-anisidine value (p-AV), malondialdehyde (MDA), acid value (AV), total oxidation (TOTOX). Superior synergistic performance of the ternary blend (Treatment E) was demonstrated versus singles (A/B/C). Retention of radical scavenging capacity was significantly enhanced, with greater stability observed under accelerated storage. Primary oxidation (PV) and secondary oxidation (MDA, p-AV) were most effectively suppressed by Treatment E. Superior color stability (minimal L* change) was maintained under thermal stress. The lowest TOTOX values were achieved across all conditions by Treatment E. Stage-specific vulnerabilities were shown by single antioxidants (BHT volatilization; pro-oxidative effects of EQ at high doses). Comprehensive, temperature-resilient protection was delivered collectively by the synergistic EQ+BHT+CA system (Treatment E) via combined radical quenching and metal chelation. The inherent limitations of individual antioxidants were effectively overcome by the optimized composite, enabling reduced total dosage while substantially extending the lipid oxidative stability period.

Indexed as

combined antioxidantsdecay kineticsevaluation approachoil oxidationsingle antioxidants

Identifiers

PMID40867877
PMCPMC12382763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.