Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867789›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Many Pros and a Little Cons: Experiences of First-Time Guide Dog Recipients.

Chalotte Glintborg, Johan Trettvik, Rasmus Holm, Tia G B Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chalotte GlintborgDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Center for Developmental & Applied Psychological Science (CeDAPS), Aalborg University, Teglgaards Plads 1, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6074-7219
Johan TrettvikDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Center for Developmental & Applied Psychological Science (CeDAPS), Aalborg University, Teglgaards Plads 1, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-2304
Rasmus HolmIndependent Scholar, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Tia G B HansenDepartment of Communication and Psychology, Center for Human Animal Psychology (CHAP), Aalborg University, Teglgaards Plads 1, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guide dogs are primarily seen as mobility aids for people with visual impairments, but they may also influence users' psychological well-being and social lives. Benefits of being partnered with a guide dog have been found in several countries but Scandinavian studies are sparse. This qualitative study explores the lived experiences of six Danish guide dog partners through semi-structured interviews. A reflexive thematic analysis found six primary benefits: improved mobility, increased physical activity, enhanced freedom and independence, new social interactions, a strong emotional bond with the dog, and better mental well-being. Users also reported challenges, including frequent distractions caused by the public interacting with the dog, difficulties during the initial adjustment period, increased cleaning, and occasional trouble finding care for the dog. Participants unanimously emphasized the irreplaceable value of their guide dogs and positive socioemotional dimensions of guide dog partnerships. The findings add Scandinavian voices that support existing international research and note three areas of potential improvement: better public education about guide dog etiquette, enhanced support during the adjustment period, and improved care-sharing arrangements. The study underscores the importance of considering guide dogs as both functional aids and sources of emotional and social support.

Indexed as

blindnessdisability aidsguide dogsqualitative studyvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID40867789
PMCPMC12382611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.