ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Method for Dairy Cow Target Detection and Tracking Based on Lightweight YOLO v11.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DRG-LiteStar-YOLO: Reliability-Guided Pseudo-Depth Fusion for Dairy Goat Detection in Complex Barns.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Multi-Feature Fusion and Optimization forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Video-based cattle behaviour detection for digital twin development in precision dairy systems.npj veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Low-Altitude UAV-Based Recognition of Porcine Facial Expressions for Early Health Monitoring.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the development of precision livestock farming, in order to achieve the goal of fine management and improve the health and welfare of dairy cows, research on dairy cow motion monitoring has become particularly important. In this study, considering the problems surrounding a large amount of model parameters, the poor accuracy of multi-target tracking, and the nonlinear motion of dairy cows in dairy farming scenes, a lightweight detection model based on improved YOLO v11n was proposed and four tracking algorithms were compared. Firstly, the Ghost module was used to replace the standard convolutions in the YOLO v11n network and a more lightweight attention mechanism called ELA was replaced, which reduced the number of model parameters by 18.59%. Then, a loss function called SDIoU was used to solve the influence of different cow target sizes. With the above improvements, the improved model achieved an increase of 2.0 percentage points and 2.3 percentage points in mAP@75 and mAP@50-95, respectively. Secondly, the performance of four tracking algorithms, including ByteTrack, BoT-SORT, OC-SORT, and BoostTrack, was systematically compared. The results show that 97.02% MOTA and 89.81% HOTA could be achieved when combined with the OC-SORT tracking algorithm. Considering the demand of equipment in lightweight models, the improved object detection model in this paper reduces the number of model parameters while offering better performance. The OC-SORT tracking algorithm enables the tracking and localization of cows through video surveillance alone, creating the necessary conditions for the continuous monitoring of cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.