Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867765›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Method for Dairy Cow Target Detection and Tracking Based on Lightweight YOLO v11.

Zhongkun Li, Guodong Cheng, Lu Yang, Shuqing Han, Yali Wang, Xiaofei Dai, Jianyu Fang, Jianzhai Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-Feature Fusion and Optimization forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhongkun LiAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1039-1116
Guodong ChengAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Lu YangAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Shuqing HanAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Yali WangAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiaofei DaiAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3829-7119
Jianyu FangAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Jianzhai WuAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4954-6499

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institutions JBYW-AII-2024-28National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFD1300604Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences CAAS-ASTIP-2025-AII
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of precision livestock farming, in order to achieve the goal of fine management and improve the health and welfare of dairy cows, research on dairy cow motion monitoring has become particularly important. In this study, considering the problems surrounding a large amount of model parameters, the poor accuracy of multi-target tracking, and the nonlinear motion of dairy cows in dairy farming scenes, a lightweight detection model based on improved YOLO v11n was proposed and four tracking algorithms were compared. Firstly, the Ghost module was used to replace the standard convolutions in the YOLO v11n network and a more lightweight attention mechanism called ELA was replaced, which reduced the number of model parameters by 18.59%. Then, a loss function called SDIoU was used to solve the influence of different cow target sizes. With the above improvements, the improved model achieved an increase of 2.0 percentage points and 2.3 percentage points in mAP@75 and mAP@50-95, respectively. Secondly, the performance of four tracking algorithms, including ByteTrack, BoT-SORT, OC-SORT, and BoostTrack, was systematically compared. The results show that 97.02% MOTA and 89.81% HOTA could be achieved when combined with the OC-SORT tracking algorithm. Considering the demand of equipment in lightweight models, the improved object detection model in this paper reduces the number of model parameters while offering better performance. The OC-SORT tracking algorithm enables the tracking and localization of cows through video surveillance alone, creating the necessary conditions for the continuous monitoring of cows.

Indexed as

dairy cowlightweight modelmulti-target trackingtarget detectionYOLO v11

Identifiers

PMID40867765
PMCPMC12382796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.