ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Intellectual Property Protection of New Animal Breeds in China: Theoretical Justification, International Comparison, and Institutional Construction.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of Sui Generis Supervision System for Gene-Edited Animals in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As vital outcomes of agricultural technological innovation, new animal breeds are not only foundational to rural revitalization but also central to preserving ecological diversity. At present, China lacks a clear and coherent legal framework of protection for new animal breeds, making it difficult to accommodate practical demands posed by modern breeding technologies such as gene editing. The results show that international models for protecting intellectual property in new animal breeds generally fall into three categories: granting patents for animal breeds, granting patents for breeding methods, and establishing sui generis rights for animal breeds. The sui generis protecting model of animal breed rights provides stronger protection and better reflects genetic specificity of such breeds. This research recommends that, on ethical review, stricter oversight of animal welfare and genetic data usage should be implemented to promote responsible innovation. On safety assessment, detailed standards should be developed for food and environmental risk assessment to ensure biodiversity and ecological sustainability. On risk balance evaluation, efforts should be made to ensure effective alignment among animal breed rights, animal welfare, and fair competition in the market, while also striking an appropriate balance of interests between breeders and other stakeholders such as farmers, who act as conservers and providers of germplasm resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.