Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867709›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Comparative Evaluation of Ovsynch and Double Ovsynch Protocols with Single and Double Insemination in Holstein Dairy Cows: Reproductive Performance and Cost Analysis.

Daniel Ionut Berean, Liviu Marian Bogdan, Raluca Cimpean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Ionut BereanDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manastur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0009-0009-3185-8687
Liviu Marian BogdanDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manastur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Raluca CimpeanDepartment of Animal Breeding and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Calea Manastur 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the reproductive and economic costs of four estrus synchronization protocols in multiparous Holstein dairy cows: Ovsynch with one or two artificial inseminations (AIs), and Double Ovsynch with one or two AIs. A total of 216 clinically healthy cows were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups (n = 54 each). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal ultrasonography at 33 days post insemination. Economic calculations included the cost of hormonal treatments, insemination, and pregnancy diagnosis, reflecting market prices in large scale Romanian dairy operations. The highest pregnancy rate (64.8%) and lowest cost per confirmed pregnancy (EUR 89.51) were achieved in the group treated with Double Ovsynch followed by a single AI. The standard Ovsynch protocol with one AI yielded the lowest conception rate (42.6%), indicating limited effectiveness under fixed-time AI conditions. These findings suggest that Double Ovsynch with a single insemination is the most effective and economically viable protocol for reproductive management in intensively managed dairy herds.

Indexed as

artificial inseminationdairy cow reproductionDouble Ovsyncheconomic efficiencyestrus synchronizationpregnancy rate

Identifiers

PMID40867709
PMCPMC12383117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.