ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Integrating Genomic Selection and Genome-Wide Association Study to Enhance Reproductive Traits in Thai Swamp Buffalo.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetics and reproduction in buffalo: latest insights into the genetic architecture of reproductive traits.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive inefficiencies, such as delayed age at first calving (AFC) and a prolonged calving interval (CI), hinder the productivity of Thai swamp buffaloes. This study aimed to improve the genetic evaluation of these traits by integrating genomic selection (GS) and genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Reproductive records (n = 1034) and genotypes (n = 474) from swamp buffaloes across Thailand were analyzed. Variance components were estimated using pedigree data, and genomic predictions were performed via weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction. AFC heritability was moderate (0.36 and 0.45), whereas CI heritability was low (0.051 and 0.043). The positive genetic correlation (rg = 0.495 and 0.517) between AFC and CI suggested potential for the simultaneous genetic improvement of both traits through selection. The WssGBLUP method showed greater effectiveness, with the prediction accuracy increasing by up to 41% for CI and 28% for AFC when compared to the ABLUP method. The GWAS revealed 20 associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosomes 3, 4, 14, 15, and 25. Candidate genes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.