Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867626›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2025

Engineering Protein-Peptide Interfaces via Combinatorial Mutagenesis and Mass Photometric Screening.

Bitasadat Hosseini, Mohammed Ashraf, Philip Kitchen, Anupama Chembath, Russell Collighan, Corinne M Spickett, Lynne Regan, Anna V Hine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bitasadat HosseiniSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Mohammed AshrafSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
Philip KitchenSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-4673
Anupama ChembathSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3684-2029
Russell CollighanSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0204-5125
Corinne M SpickettSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4054-9279
Lynne ReganCentre for Synthetic & Systems Biology, Institute for Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JU, UK.
Anna V HineSchool of Biosciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4065-831X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SpyTag-SpyCatcher system, developed by the Howarth lab, is based on splitting the CnaB2 domain from Streptococcus pyogenes into two parts: a 13-amino-acid SpyTag and a 116-amino-acid SpyCatcher. Upon incubation, they spontaneously form a covalent isopeptide bond between Asp7 (SpyTag) and Lys31 (SpyCatcher). This study explores whether the interaction specificity can be modulated by altering hydrophobic residues within the SpyCatcher binding pocket and corresponding SpyTag positions, potentially to create orthogonal SpyTag-SpyCatcher pairs. Libraries of SpyCatcher and SpyTag were created by partial saturation mutagenesis using overlap PCR and MAX randomisation, respectively. To assess the specificity of the SpyCatcher-SpyTag interaction within the resulting protein mixtures, a novel screening strategy based on mass photometry was developed to detect isopeptide bond formation. We demonstrate tolerance to mutation in the hydrophobic binding pocket of SpyCatcher in terms of binding native SpyTag and demonstrate what to our knowledge constitutes the first example of using mass photometry to examine the interactions of small libraries of proteins with a given ligand. Mass photometry detects stable interactions whether covalent or not and so this study suggests the prospect of employing mass photometry for more general application in protein engineering.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsMutagenesisPeptidesProtein EngineeringBinding SitesHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein BindingStreptococcus pyogenesBacterial ProteinsPeptidescombinatorial librariesmass photometryMAX randomizationoverlap PCRpositional saturation mutagenesisSpyTag–SpyCatcher

Identifiers

PMID40867626
PMCPMC12384687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.