Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867583›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2025

Sustainable, Targeted, and Cost-Effective Laccase-Based Bioremediation Technologies for Antibiotic Residues in the Ecosystem: A Comprehensive Review.

Rinat Ezra, Gulamnabi Vanti, Segula Masaphy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rinat EzraChelmsford Campus, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.
Gulamnabi VantiMultidisciplinary Research Unit, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Vidyanagar, Hubli 580021, India.
Segula MasaphyFaculty of Science and Technology, Tel Hai College, Upper Galilee, Kiryat Shmona 12210, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread antibiotic residues are accumulating in the environment, potentially causing adverse effects for humans, animals, and the ecosystem, including an increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria, resulting in worldwide concern. There are various commonly used physical, chemical, and biological treatments for the degradation of antibiotics. However, the elimination of toxic end products generated by physicochemical methods and the need for industrial applications pose significant challenges. Hence, environmentally sustainable, green, and readily available approaches for the transformation and degradation of these antibiotic compounds are being sought. Herein, we review the impact of sustainable fungal laccase-based bioremediation strategies. Fungal laccase enzyme is considered one of the most active enzymes for biotransformation and biodegradation of antibiotic residue in vitro. For industrial applications, the low laccase yields in natural and genetically modified hosts may constitute a bottleneck. Methods to screen for high-laccase-producing sources, optimizing cultivation conditions, and identifying key genes and metabolites involved in extracellular laccase activity are reviewed. These include advanced transcriptomics, proteomics, and metagenomics technologies, as well as diverse laccase-immobilization technologies with different inert carrier/support materials improving enzyme performance whilst shifting from experimental assays to in situ monitoring of residual toxicity. Still, more basic and applied research on laccase-mediated bioremediation of pharmaceuticals, especially antibiotics that are recalcitrant and prevalent, is needed.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalLaccaseCost-Benefit AnalysisEcosystemFungiHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsLaccaseadvanced laccase-based bioremediationantibiotic residuesecosystemsenvironmental sustainabilityfungal laccases optimizationintermediates byproductstoxicity evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40867583
PMCPMC12383733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.