ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emotional Intelligence and Adolescents' Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Parent-Adolescent Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversational artificial intelligence and children's social-emotional development: a scoping review.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Digital Intelligence, Emotional Intelligence, Self-Disclosure, and Fear of Missing Out Among Thai Generation Z: A Cross-Sectional PLS-SEM Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- AI-Generated Content Disclosure and Prolonged Short-Video Engagement: A Heuristic-Systematic Risk-Trust Model Among Late-Adolescent and Emerging-Adult TikTok Users.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) profoundly shapes adolescents' digital experiences, presenting both developmental opportunities and risks related to privacy and psychological well-being. This study investigates first the possible generational gap between adolescents and their parents in AI use and trust, and then the associations between the Trait Emotional Intelligence (trait EI), parenting styles, perceived social support, and parental involvement on adolescents' use and trust in AI-based technologies. Participants were 170 adolescents (aged 13-17) and 175 parents from southern Italy, who completed standardized questionnaires assessing parenting styles, Trait Emotional Intelligence (Trait EI), social support, digital literacy, and use and trust in AI. Adolescents used AI more frequently than parents, especially for school- or work-related support and were more likely to seek behavioral advice from AI. They also showed higher trust in AI data security and the quality of behavioral advice than parents. Moreover, greater trait EI and more authoritative (vs. authoritarian) parenting were associated with less frequent AI use and lower use and trust in AI. In 47 matched parent-adolescent dyads, cluster analysis identified Balanced Users (higher trait EI, authoritative parenting, stronger support, cautious AI use) and At-Risk Users (lower trait EI, authoritarian parenting, lower support, heavier and more trusting AI use) Despite no causal inferences can be drawn due to the correlational nature of the data, the results suggested the importance of considering adolescents' trait EI and authoritative parenting practices in supporting balanced and critical digital engagement, highlighting the concept of a "digital secure base" as essential for navigating the evolving digital landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.