ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Neural Correlates of Facial Attractiveness in Resume Screening: Evidence from ERPs.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial attractiveness plays a significant role in job search evaluations, with recruiters often rating candidates with higher levels of attractiveness more favorably. This paper investigates how physical appearance and employability jointly influence applicant evaluations during resume screening. Using event-related potential (ERP) techniques, the study observes dynamic brain changes during the experiment. The findings reveal that: (1) Employability significantly enhances P200 amplitudes (reflecting early attentional allocation), while its effects on N170 and LPP components are contingent upon attractiveness levels; (2) These employability effects are selectively modulated by facial attractiveness: under high-attractiveness conditions, high employability potentiates both P200 and LPP responses (suggesting enhanced motivational engagement and emotional arousal); low employability leads to more negative N170 amplitudes (indicating early conflict detection to stereotype-incongruent cues). Conversely, no such effects emerge under low-attractiveness conditions, demonstrating that facial attractiveness gates the neural prioritization of qualification information. These results provide valuable insights into job search evaluations and highlight the neural mechanisms involved in facial perception and processing during resume screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.