ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Through Another's Eyes: Implicit SNARC-like Attention Bias Reveals Allocentric Mapping of Numerical Magnitude.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerical magnitude can bias spatial attention, typically facilitating faster responses to the left for small numbers and to the right for large numbers-an effect traditionally attributed to egocentric spatial mappings. However, in everyday environments, individuals often share space with others, raising the question of whether such spatial-numerical associations can spontaneously reorganize based on another person's visual perspective. To investigate this, we employed a digit-primed visual detection paradigm in which participants judged the location (left, right, up, or down) of a briefly presented peripheral probe following centrally displayed digits. If numerical magnitude implicitly guides attention, probe detection should be faster when its location is congruent with the digit-induced spatial bias. Critically, in the avatar condition, a task-irrelevant avatar was positioned on the participant's left side, such that the avatar's horizontal (left-right) axis corresponded to the participant's vertical (up-down) axis-an axis along which egocentric numerical biases are typically absent. If participants spontaneously adopted the avatar's perspective, numerical cues might induce attentional biases along this axis. Results revealed two simultaneous effects: a canonical egocentric SNARC-like effect (small-left, large-right) and a novel allocentric effect (small-up, large-down) emerged along the vertical axis, implicitly aligned with the avatar's left-right spatial orientation. Numerical extremity enhanced the egocentric SNARC-like effect but had no effect in the allocentric case, pointing to a distinct mechanism rooted in embodied spatial perspective. These findings suggest that numerical magnitude can implicitly map onto both egocentric and allocentric spatial frames, reflecting a implicit and embodied mechanism of social understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.