Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867438›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Reflection Rumination Reduces Negative Emotional Processing During Goal-Directed Behavior: An ERP Study.

Max Owens, Jessica Renaud, Ashly S Healy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max OwensDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida Saint Petersburg Campus, 140 7th Ave S, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
Jessica RenaudDepartment of Psychology, University of South Florida Saint Petersburg Campus, 140 7th Ave S, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA.
Ashly S HealyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, 2700 18th St, Lubbock, TX 79406, USA.

Funding

University of South Florida St. Petersburg N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait rumination is a repetitive and often maladaptive attentional focus on the consequences of depression. Rumination independently contributes to cognitive control dysfunction associated with depression. However, it is not clear how the effects of rumination on cognitive control may contribute to negative attention biases as well, or whether it is specific to brooding or reflective rumination. To address these questions, the current study examined the link between trait rumination, cognitive control, and attentional biases. Participants were given a task to remember three neutral faces across a delay period with a single irrelevant sad, happy, or scrambled face distractor. Memory accuracy was also collected. Additionally, the amplitude of the emotion processing late positive potential (LPP) component was recorded by electroencephalograph (EEG) in response to distractors. Brooding and reflection were not associated with memory accuracy. Brooding was not significantly related to LPP amplitudes. A significant emotion by reflection interaction on LPP amplitudes was observed. As the reflection levels increased, the LPP amplitudes for sad faces decreased relative to amplitudes for scrambled faces. The effects were maintained while controlling for brooding and depression. The results suggest that reflection may bias attention toward control over negative distraction but not improve accuracy and, thus, may contribute to cognitive inefficiency associated with depression.

Indexed as

cognitive controlevent-related potentialnegative biasrumination

Identifiers

PMID40867438
PMCPMC12383120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.