ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of Phoneme Discrimination in the Variability of Speech and Language Outcomes Among Children with Hearing Loss.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is There a Relationship Between Infant and Toddler Speech Discrimination Abilities and Mean Length of Utterance at 33 Months?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research compares speech discrimination abilities between 17 children who are hard-of-hearing (CHH) and 13 children with normal hearing (CNH), aged 9 to 36 months, using either a conditioned head turn (CHT) or condition play paradigm, for two phoneme pairs /ba-da/ and /sa-ʃa/. As CHH were tested in the aided and unaided conditions, CNH were also tested on each phoneme contrast twice to control for learning effects. When speech discrimination abilities were compared between CHH, with hearing aids (HAs), and CNH, there were no statistical differences observed in performance on stop consonant discrimination, but a significant statistical difference was observed for fricative discrimination performance. Among CHH, significant benefits were observed for /ba-da/ speech discrimination while wearing HAs, compared to the no HA condition. All CHH were early-identified, early amplified, and were enrolled in parent-centered early intervention services. Under these conditions, CHH demonstrated the ability to discriminate speech comparable to CNH. Additionally, repeated testing within 1-month did not result in a change in speech discrimination scores, indicating good test-retest reliability of speech discrimination scores. Finally, this research explored the question of infant/toddler listening fatigue in the behavioral speech discrimination task. The CHT paradigm included returning to a contrast (i.e., /a-i/) previously shown to be easier for both CHH and CNH to discriminate to examine if failure to discriminate /ba-da/ or /sa-ʃa/ was due to listening fatigue or off-task behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.