ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Identification of Mandarin Tones in Loud Speech for Native Speakers and Second Language Learners.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Teachers often raise their vocal volume to improve intelligibility or capture students' attention. While this practice is common in second language (L2) teaching, its effects on tone perception remain understudied. To fill this gap, this study explores the effects of loud speech on Mandarin tone perception for L2 learners. Twenty-two native Mandarin speakers and twenty-two Thai L2 learners were tested on their perceptual accuracy and reaction time in identifying Mandarin tones in loud and normal modes. Results revealed a significant between-group difference: native speakers consistently demonstrated a ceiling effect across all tones, while L2 learners exhibited lower accuracy, particularly for Tone 3, the falling-rising tone. The loud speech had different impacts on the two groups. For native speakers, tone perception accuracy remained stable across different speech modes. In contrast, for L2 learners, loud speech significantly reduced the accuracy of Tone 3 identification and increased confusion between Tones 2 and 3. Reaction times in milliseconds were prolonged for all tones in loud speech for both groups. When subtracting the length of the tones, the delay of RT was evident only for Tones 3 and 4. Therefore, raising the speaking volume negatively affects the Mandarin tone perception of L2 learners, especially in distinguishing Tone 2 and Tone 3. Our findings have implications for both theories of L2 tone perception and pedagogical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.